IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v51y2000i12p1817-1825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information and its impact on satisfaction among surgical patients

Author

Listed:
  • Krupat, Edward
  • Fancey, Marcella
  • Cleary, Paul D.

Abstract

This study investigates the association between patient characteristics, reported problems with obtaining information and global evaluations of care among surgical patients. Using data from a large scale study of hospital care, a factor analysis of 30 information-relevant items was conducted with data from a sample of 3602 surgical patients; and correlation and multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify the relationships among information, patient characteristics and global evaluations of care. Path analysis was also used to determine the extent to which perceived control mediates the information-evaluation relationship. Four information factors were identified: surgical information, recovery information, general information and sensory information, and each was significantly related to global evaluations. Desire for involvement interacted with information received in determining patients' evaluations; and partial support was found for perceived control as a mediator of the information-evaluation link. The data indicate that the relationship between information and evaluations of quality is generalizable across patients, conditions and hospitals; and should be defined more broadly to include that which is given by a variety of providers, to family, and about medications and home recovery. Desire for involvement and perceived control must also be considered in understanding the value and impact of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Krupat, Edward & Fancey, Marcella & Cleary, Paul D., 2000. "Information and its impact on satisfaction among surgical patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 1817-1825, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:12:p:1817-1825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00113-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian S Fuller & Agata Pacho & Claire E Broad & Achyuta V Nori & Emma M Harding-Esch & Syed Tariq Sadiq, 2019. "“It’s not a time spent issue, it’s a ‘what have you spent your time doing?’ issue…” A qualitative study of UK patient opinions and expectations for implementation of Point of Care Tests for sexually t," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Mark Mitchell, 2017. "Day surgery nurses' selection of patient preoperative information," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 225-237, January.
    3. Elizabeth Fitzpatrick & Abbey Hyde, 2006. "Nurse‐related factors in the delivery of preoperative patient education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 671-677, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:12:p:1817-1825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.