IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i1p53-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking patient satisfaction: patient experiences of an open access flexible sigmoidoscopy service

Author

Listed:
  • Dougall, Audrey
  • Russell, Andrew
  • Rubin, Greg
  • Ling, Jane

Abstract

The high morbidity and mortality rates for colo-rectal cancer in Teesside, UK, have led to the initiation of an open access service in two local National Health Service Trust hospitals. This paper reports the results of a pilot patient satisfaction study of the service using a combination of participant-observation, in-depth interviews and questionnaire methods. Although offering a standardised service, ethnographic study revealed interesting differences in practice and follow-up procedures between the two hospitals. Patients, both verbally and on paper, expressed high levels of satisfaction with the services offered at both hospitals, yet in-depth, qualitative research revealed a more complex picture. The evidence from this research will be used to argue that standard consumer satisfaction questionnaires of health provision are inadequate indicators of patients' experience of health care delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Dougall, Audrey & Russell, Andrew & Rubin, Greg & Ling, Jane, 2000. "Rethinking patient satisfaction: patient experiences of an open access flexible sigmoidoscopy service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 53-62, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:1:p:53-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00256-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Callaghan, Gillian & Wistow, Gerald, 2006. "Governance and public involvement in the British National Health Service: Understanding difficulties and developments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2289-2300, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:1:p:53-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.