IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i12p1851-1862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology, selfhood and physical disability

Author

Listed:
  • Lupton, Deborah
  • Seymour, Wendy

Abstract

Much has been written in recent times of the interface between technologies and the human body. The vast majority of this literature, however, focuses on a body that is assumed to be free of physical disability. This article seeks to address this lacuna by presenting findings from an exploratory study using in-depth interviews with fifteen people with physical disabilities living in the Australian city of Adelaide. The dominant research question was to explore the ways in which technologies contribute to the meanings and experiences of the lived body/self with disabilities. The data showed that the interviewees identified several technologies that they used as highly beneficial to allowing them to transcend some aspects of their disabilities. However, the interviewees also identified significant negative aspects to the use of some technologies. They noted that such technologies could serve to mark out people with disabilities as 'different' or 'lacking', acting as a barrier to the achievement and presentation of their preferred body/self.

Suggested Citation

  • Lupton, Deborah & Seymour, Wendy, 2000. "Technology, selfhood and physical disability," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 1851-1862, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:12:p:1851-1862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00422-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirk, Susan, 2010. "How children and young people construct and negotiate living with medical technology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1796-1803, November.
    2. Sylvia Söderström, 2013. "Digital Differentiation in Young People’s Internet Use—Eliminating or Reproducing Disability Stereotypes," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Gibson, Barbara E. & Young, Nancy L. & Upshur, Ross E.G. & McKeever, Patricia, 2007. "Men on the margin: A Bourdieusian examination of living into adulthood with muscular dystrophy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 505-517, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:12:p:1851-1862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.