IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i12p1843-1850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretative repertoires of medication among the oldest-old

Author

Listed:
  • Lumme-Sandt, Kirsi
  • Hervonen, Antti
  • Jylhä, Marja

Abstract

The use of medical drugs is not founded on medical knowledge alone, but it is also dependent on lay logic and reasoning. This study set out to explore the views of the oldest-old on their medication. The data for the study came from narrative interviews with people aged 90 or over. Our aim was to look for different culturally shared interpretative repertoires used by the interviewees as they gave descriptions and accounts of their drug use and presented themselves as users of medical drugs. Three interpretative repertoires were identified. The moral repertoire stressed lay people's moral norms and presented them as morally acceptable and responsible users of drugs by explaining and minimizing. The patient repertoire was used by the respondents to show they had accepted the role of patient. The self-help repertoire was used by the respondents to emphasize that they had made their own choices in medical care despite the biomedical facts. These repertoires showed that not only the biomedical logic, but also other logics are valid in the everyday world where most medical drugs are used. A better understanding of cultural ideas of drug use would help to improve the care of older people.

Suggested Citation

  • Lumme-Sandt, Kirsi & Hervonen, Antti & Jylhä, Marja, 2000. "Interpretative repertoires of medication among the oldest-old," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 1843-1850, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:12:p:1843-1850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00421-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nakata, Cheryl & Sharp, Lisa K. & Spanjol, Jelena & Cui, Anna Shaojie & Izberk-Bilgin, Elif & Crawford, Stephanie Y. & Xiao, Yazhen, 2021. "Narrative arcs and shaping influences in long-term medication adherence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. van Wijngaarden, Els & Sanders, José, 2022. "‘I want to die on my own terms’: Dominant interpretative repertoires of ‘a good death’ in old age in Dutch newspapers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Ceuterick, Melissa & Vandebroek, Ina, 2017. "Identity in a medicine cabinet: Discursive positions of Andean migrants towards their use of herbal remedies in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 43-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:12:p:1843-1850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.