IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v50y2000i12p1723-1741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory diagramming as a means to improve communication about sex in rural Zimbabwe: a pilot study

Author

Listed:
  • Kesby, Mike

Abstract

It is increasingly recognised that unequal gender relations and poor communication between men and women about sexual matters, play a central role in the rapid transmission of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. Analysis of how communication might practically be improved remains a critical area for investigation however. To this end a pilot study, conducted in January 1998 involving two all-female focus groups in two rural areas of Zimbabwe, explored the possibility of using 'participatory' methods and visual diagramming as a means to facilitate rural people's communication about issues of sexual health. While still provisional, the results hold considerable interest for future HIV/AIDS work in the region. As a research tool, diagramming provides richer, more nuanced data about sexual activity than wholly discursive focus groups. However, the technique also holds considerable potential for action research and positive interventions that seek to facilitate couples' more open communication and safer sexual decision making. The pilot established both that rural women were comfortable utilising the techniques and that they were prepared to use them to discuss the detail of their sex lives. The next and vital step, as participants themselves suggested, is to involve men in similar self-analytical activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kesby, Mike, 2000. "Participatory diagramming as a means to improve communication about sex in rural Zimbabwe: a pilot study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(12), pages 1723-1741, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:12:p:1723-1741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00413-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oleke, Christopher & Blystad, Astrid & Rekdal, Ole Bjørn, 2005. ""When the obvious brother is not there": Political and cultural contexts of the orphan challenge in northern Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2628-2638, December.
    2. Liddell, Christine & Barrett, Louise & Bydawell, Moya, 2005. "Indigenous representations of illness and AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 691-700, February.
    3. Tawfik, Linda & Watkins, Susan Cotts, 2007. "Sex in Geneva, sex in Lilongwe, and sex in Balaka," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 1090-1101, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:50:y:2000:i:12:p:1723-1741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.