IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i3p405-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource dependency, doctors and the state: quality control in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Garpenby, Peter

Abstract

This paper focuses on the interaction between the state and the medical profession on the national level in Sweden with respect to issues concerning quality in health care. Using the concepts of policy network and resource dependency as points of departure, two examples of interorganisational relationships are analysed which relate to medical/professional quality and organisational quality, respectively. These are (1) the control of the national quality registers and (2) the development of third-party accreditation in health care organisations. During the 1990s the state has become increasingly dependent on participation by the profession in order to obtain outcome data and other resources controlled by the profession. In Sweden, a fragmented state has established various types of linkages with the organised medical profession, all of which are characterised by mutual resource dependency.

Suggested Citation

  • Garpenby, Peter, 1999. "Resource dependency, doctors and the state: quality control in Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 405-424, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:3:p:405-424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00130-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blomgren, Maria & Sundén, Eva, 2008. "Constructing a European healthcare market: The private healthcare company Capio and the strategic aspect of the drive for transparency," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(10), pages 1512-1520, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:3:p:405-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.