IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i3p303-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stability of elderly persons' expressed preferences regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments

Author

Listed:
  • Carmel, Sara
  • Mutran, Elizabeth J.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the stability of expressed preferences for the use of life-sustaining treatments (LST) in severe illness conditions over two years. The two year longitudinal study included three structured interviews with a one-year interval (1994, 1995, and 1996). At baseline, 1138 Israeli elderly persons (70+) were interviewed, 802 and 638 were interviewed in the following stages. Stability over time was assessed on the basis of score differences on two different indices that measured the wish to prolong life. Overall 70% of the respondents had stable preferences for the use of LST over time. This result was similar on both indices. The large majority of those with stable preferences (86%) did not want to prolong life already in the baseline interview. This was the most stable group. Among those who changed their wishes, the group that wanted LST less at stage 3 (20%) was twice as large as the group that wanted LST more (10%). These findings, which are similar to those reported in a study of an American sample, indicate a high level of stability in elderly persons' expressed preferences for LST at the end of life, and, therefore, strengthen the ethical basis for using advance directives. They also indicate that elderly persons of different cultural backgrounds may face similar problems regarding the prolongation of life and respond to them similarly.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmel, Sara & Mutran, Elizabeth J., 1999. "Stability of elderly persons' expressed preferences regarding the use of life-sustaining treatments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 303-311, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:3:p:303-311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00121-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Li Way, 2008. "Compassion and the Hippocratic Oath," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1724-1728, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:3:p:303-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.