IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v47y1998i11p1715-1727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using metaphor to read the organisation of the NHS

Author

Listed:
  • Elkind, Andrea

Abstract

The paper is concerned with the complexity of the British National Health Service (NHS) as an organisation and with different ways of seeing this. Morgan proposes that explanations of organisational life are based on metaphors which highlight particular interpretations (Morgan, G., 1986, Images of Organisation. London, Sage). The ability to "read" a complex phenomenon depends on being able to see how these different aspects co-exist. The study applies metaphoric thinking to the organisation of the NHS. Utilising documentary data sources, a diagnostic reading is made examining different metaphors to highlight key aspects of the situation. The metaphors of machine and organism are drawn from Morgan's conceptual scheme, those of religion and marketplace are proposed as of particular relevance to the NHS. In the religious metaphor the focus is on the mission of the NHS in terms of its founding principles of universality, comprehensiveness, equality and collectivism. Perceived as a machine the NHS is characterised as an organisation originally based on technocratic rationality and its subsequent history interpreted as moving towards increasingly centralised control. An alternative perspective on the same events is considered in terms of the organic metaphor. In this view the NHS is examined as an open system, which is devolved, decentralised, participative and responsive to its environment. The image of the marketplace focuses on the impact on the organisation of the introduction of competition and incentives in the post-reform period. Other images are sketched briefly. In the critical evaluation the insights generated by the different images are assessed and the different interpretations linked together. It is concluded that metaphoric thinking enables us to appreciate and interpret the ambiguities and paradoxes in NHS organisational life.

Suggested Citation

  • Elkind, Andrea, 1998. "Using metaphor to read the organisation of the NHS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(11), pages 1715-1727, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:11:p:1715-1727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(98)00251-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stewart, Ellen & Nonhebel, Anna & Möller, Christian & Bassett, Kath, 2022. "Doing ‘our bit’: Solidarity, inequality, and COVID-19 crowdfunding for the UK National Health Service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Müller, Sune Dueholm & Mathiassen, Lars & Balshøj, Hans Henrik, 2008. "Organizational Change Perspectives on Software Process Improvement," Informatics Research Group Working Papers I-2008-02, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    3. Rachael Pope, 2017. "The NHS: Sticking Fingers in Its Ears, Humming Loudly," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 577-598, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:47:y:1998:i:11:p:1715-1727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.