IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i4p597-604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of medical technologies in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Jönsson, Bengt

Abstract

This paper reviews the use of economic evaluations in the Swedish health care system. The most important actors are defined and examples are given how economic evaluations have played a role in the decision making process. The introduction of extracorporal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is used as an example on how economic evaluation was used for recommendations to the county councils to adopt this technology. Mammography is used as an example of how the evaluation is used in the political process following an initiative in the parliament. A study of the cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment illustrates how economic evaluations are included as part of a medical technology assessment by SBU, the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. The role of economic evaluations for drug reimbursement and pricing is also reviewed. The main conclusions are that economic evaluations are one of several factors influencing a decision making process that have a strong strive for consensus. It is thus difficult to make a definitive statement of the contribution of such study to the outcome of the decision making process, and there is no evidence that the evaluation was the decisive factor. However, a number of changes in the way resources are allocated in the Swedish health care system speaks for an increasing role for such studies in the future. The county councils are identified as the main target for economic evaluations, and SBU has a key role in supplying the county with high quality assessment of new and old technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jönsson, Bengt, 1997. "Economic evaluation of medical technologies in Sweden," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 597-604, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:4:p:597-604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00399-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eddama, Oya & Coast, Joanna, 2008. "A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(2-3), pages 129-141, May.
    2. Gerard, Karen & Smoker, Irenie & Seymour, Janelle, 1999. "Raising the quality of cost-utility analyses: lessons learnt and still to learn," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 217-238, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:4:p:597-604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.