IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v45y1997i2p261-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriateness in health care: Application to prescribing

Author

Listed:
  • Buetow, Stephen A.
  • Sibbald, Bonnie
  • Cantrill, Judith A.
  • Halliwell, Shirley

Abstract

To help account for and address observed variations in medical practice, evaluations of "appropriateness" have sought to supplement incomplete evidence with professional opinion. This article contributes to an understanding and refinement of the construct of appropriateness by discussing how it has been defined and applied in studies of health care in general and prescribing in particular. We suggest that appropriateness is the outcome of a process of decisiondashmaking that maximises net individual health gains within society's available resources. This definition distinguishes between (in)appropriate prescribing, as an outcome, and (ir)rational prescribing as a process. To assess appropriateness, we advocate combining explicit criteria with independent review in cases of uncertainty and disagreement. Refinements based on reviews using implicit criteria should draw on shared professional knowledge and post hoc state the process followed as explicitly as possible. The Medication Appropriateness Index is shown to provide a solid foundation for identifying dimensions of prescribing appropriateness.

Suggested Citation

  • Buetow, Stephen A. & Sibbald, Bonnie & Cantrill, Judith A. & Halliwell, Shirley, 1997. "Appropriateness in health care: Application to prescribing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 261-271, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:261-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00342-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudio Lucifora & Antonio Russo & Daria Vigani, 2021. "Does prescribing appropriateness reduce health expenditures? Main effects and unintended outcomes," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def103, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    2. Stacy‐ann Robinson, 2020. "Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    3. Levaggi, Rosella & Moretto, Michele & Pertile, Paolo, 2014. "Two-part payments for the reimbursement of investments in health technologies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 230-236.
    4. Wenwei Liu & Suwei Yuan & Fengqing Wei & Jing Yang & Zhe Zhang & Changbin Zhu & Jin Ma, 2015. "Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Beatriz González López-Valcárcel & Anselmo López Cabañas & Antonio Cabeza Mora & José Antonio Díaz Berenguer & Vicente Ortún & Fayna Álamo Santana, 2005. "Drug utilization studies and data registries in primary care," Economics Working Papers 809, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    6. Rosella Levaggi & Michele Moretto & Paolo Pertile, 2012. "DRGs: the link between investment in technologies and appropriateness," Working Papers 31/2012, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    7. Loris Tramite & Rosa Caterina Marmo & Roberta Giordana & Rocco Palumbo, 2017. "I nuovi Livelli Essenziali di Assistenza (L.E.A.) tra economicit? ed appropriatezza: un?analisi sperimentale," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(101), pages 51-74.
    8. Manuela Casula & Ilaria Ardoino & Carlotta Franchi, 2023. "Appropriateness of the Prescription and Use of Medicines: An Old Concept but More Relevant than Ever," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-5, February.
    9. Sara Mucherino & Manuela Casula & Federica Galimberti & Ilaria Guarino & Elena Olmastroni & Elena Tragni & Valentina Orlando & Enrica Menditto & on behalf of the EDU.RE.DRUG Group, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Interventions to Evaluate and Reduce Healthcare Costs of Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions among the Older Adults: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:45:y:1997:i:2:p:261-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.