IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i3p315-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The simultaneous analysis of patient, physician and group practice influences on annual mammography performance

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, Roger L.
  • Baumann, Linda J.
  • Helberg, Clay P.
  • Han, Youngshook
  • Fontana, Susan A.
  • Love, Richard R.

Abstract

The current study examined the relationship of several variables at the patient (n = 2780), physician (n = 166), and group practice (n = 45) levels for predicting receipt of annual mammography screening. Patient-level variables included constructs from the Triandis Model of Choice; physician-level variables included measures of barriers and receptiveity to prevention, as well as demographic information. Hierarchical modeling demonstrated that variables at the patient and physician level reliably predict annual mammography screening, while frequency of screening did not vary across group practices after accounting for patient and physician variables. Patient-level predictors included social norms, perceived consequences and perceived barriers. The only physician-level predictor identified was annual mammography recommendation. These findings add to data which emphasize the importance of public education and social support in health maintenance activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Roger L. & Baumann, Linda J. & Helberg, Clay P. & Han, Youngshook & Fontana, Susan A. & Love, Richard R., 1996. "The simultaneous analysis of patient, physician and group practice influences on annual mammography performance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 315-324, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:3:p:315-324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00379-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. S. Blumenthal-Barby & Heather Krieger, 2015. "Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(4), pages 539-557, May.
    2. Gerald J. Pruckner & Thomas Schober & Katrin Zocher, 2020. "The company you keep: health behavior among work peers," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(2), pages 251-259, March.
    3. Jonathan O’Hara & Crystal McPhee & Sarity Dodson & Annie Cooper & Carol Wildey & Melanie Hawkins & Alexandra Fulton & Vicki Pridmore & Victoria Cuevas & Mathew Scanlon & Patricia M. Livingston & Richa, 2018. "Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening among Diverse Cultural Groups in Melbourne, Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:3:p:315-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.