IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v43y1996i12p1709-1720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of the use of ambulant social care by the elderly

Author

Listed:
  • Crets, Stefan

Abstract

Policy makers and scientists are increasingly concerned with the use of formal care services by the elderly. This article demonstrates that there are three different care systems: the informal, the commercial and the formal (public) system. In terms of prevalence, the formal system is the least important one. By means of a cross-sectional sample of the elderly population of Antwerp, an Andersen model is estimated to explain the use of formal services. This model shows that the level of functional capacity of the elderly is a crucial factor. Yet, the effect this has on the use of care varies according to the different living arrangements. "Need" as such, therefore, does not determine the use of formal services, since its effect is modified by the different alternatives that are at the disposal of the elderly person (living arrangements, informal care, income, availability of commercial alternatives). In the conclusion it is argued that the Andersen model, in a cross-sectional design, is inadequate to construct a theory concerning the use of care services.

Suggested Citation

  • Crets, Stefan, 1996. "Determinants of the use of ambulant social care by the elderly," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(12), pages 1709-1720, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:12:p:1709-1720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(96)00060-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masashige Saito & Naoki Kondo & Jun Aida & Junko Saito & Hisataka Anezaki & Toshiyuki Ojima & Katsunori Kondo, 2021. "Differences in Cumulative Long-Term Care Costs by Community Activities and Employment: A Prospective Follow-Up Study of Older Japanese Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Paul McNamee & Barbara A. Gregson & Ken Wright & Debbie Buck & Claire H. Bamford & John Bond, 1998. "Estimation of a multiproduct cost function for physically frail older people," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(8), pages 701-710, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:43:y:1996:i:12:p:1709-1720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.