IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v42y1996i7p1069-1075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact on employment of an intervention to increase recognition of previously untreated anxiety among primary care physicians

Author

Listed:
  • Yelin, Edward
  • Mathias, Susan D.
  • Buesching, Don P.
  • Rowland, Clayton
  • Calucin, Ruth Q.
  • Fifer, Sheila

Abstract

Anxiety is a common, though often unrecognized, problem in primary care settings. This study examines the effect on employment of an intervention designed to attune primary care physicians to previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety. Primary care physicians in a mixed-model health maintenance organization (HMO) were randomized by practice site to groups with (intervention) and without (usual care) intensive one-on-one education about anxiety and periodic feedback about their patients with anxiety. All persons 21-65 years of age presenting to the offices of these primary care providers were screened for anxiety with the SCL-90-R on two occasions. Those meeting the SCL-90-R cutpoints for anxiety and whose medical records provided no evidence of recognition or treatment for a mental health condition within the last 6 months were eligible for the study (n = 637). Of these, 573 (90%) completed two follow-up assessments. The present study evaluates the impact of the intervention aimed at the primary care physicians on the labor force participation rate of the persons with anxiety after 5 months of follow-up. The study also evaluates the impact of the intervention on hours of work and the presence of days spent in bed among the persons with anxiety working at the baseline interview and after 5 months. At baseline, the patients of intervention and usual care physicians with previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety did not differ in labor force participation rates. At the conclusion of the study, the patients of the intervention group physicians had significantly lower rates of labor force participation than those of the usual care group physicians. Among those working both at the beginning and conclusion of the study, the intervention had no impact on hours of work or the presence of days spent in bed. We conclude that attuning physicians to anxiety may reduce labor force participation rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Yelin, Edward & Mathias, Susan D. & Buesching, Don P. & Rowland, Clayton & Calucin, Ruth Q. & Fifer, Sheila, 1996. "The impact on employment of an intervention to increase recognition of previously untreated anxiety among primary care physicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 1069-1075, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:7:p:1069-1075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00297-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva Rothermund & Martina Michaelis & Marc N. Jarczok & Elisabeth M. Balint & Rahna Lange & Stephan Zipfel & Harald Gündel & Monika A. Rieger & Florian Junne, 2018. "Prevention of Common Mental Disorders in Employees. Perspectives on Collaboration from Three Health Care Professions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:7:p:1069-1075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.