IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v42y1996i2p281-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anthropology, clinical pathology and the electronic fetal monitor: Lessons from the heart

Author

Listed:
  • Bassett, Ken

Abstract

Clinical pathology, the social process of applying disease categories and managing disease processes, is defined and its anthropological study described using examples from a study of Electronic Fetal Monitor (EFM) use during hospital obstetrical care in a rural Canadian village. Anthropological work on clinical pathology is shown to have helped doctors and nurses in this village to better understand both the cultural contingencies of their basic science knowledge and the historical contingencies of its application to the care of women during pregnancy and birth. It is argued that cultural anthropologists should study diagnostic and treatment activities, especially those involving sophisticated technology; their methods and theories make them ideally suited to this task.

Suggested Citation

  • Bassett, Ken, 1996. "Anthropology, clinical pathology and the electronic fetal monitor: Lessons from the heart," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 281-292, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:2:p:281-292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(95)00101-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roth, Louise Marie, 2023. "Defensive versus evidence-based medical technology: Liability risk and electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk births," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:42:y:1996:i:2:p:281-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.