IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i4p529-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strategy of risk approach in antenatal care: Evaluation of the referral compliance

Author

Listed:
  • Dujardin, B.
  • Clarysse, G.
  • Criel, B.
  • De Brouwere, V.
  • Wangata, N.

Abstract

The main goal of antenatal care in developing countries is to identify women whose pregnancy or delivery is likely to raise problems and to refer them at the appropriate time to a hospital facility where the necessary medical equipment and expertise (vacuum extractors, cesarian sections, human skill, etc.) is available. This approach, which is known as the Risk Approach (RA) strategy, is expected to significantly reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. However, the RA will function properly only if the women identified at risk agree to give birth in a hospital on the one hand, and if they can indeed reach this hospital on the other hand. In this article the authors assess to what extent women with a risk of difficult labor (nulliparous or primiparous women under 150 cm, history of previous difficult delivery or stillbirth, women with transverse lie) agreed to give birth in a hospital. This descriptive survey, which covered 5060 pregnancies monitored in the Kasongo District, Maniema, in eastern Zaire, showed that the referral success rate in this socioeconomically very disadvantaged region was only 33%, despite some favorable conditions, such as a strong emphasis on community participation, a complementarity of health centers and hospital, and the absence of financial barriers within the health services system. Of the various hypotheses tested, the geographic accessibility of the hospital and the parturient's perception of the risk status were the two most important factors determining the compliance rate. A stratified analysis shows that the intensity of the parturient's perception has a different impact on compliance whether rural or urban situations are considered. In their conclusions, the authors stress the importance of the problem and the need for additional qualitative studies (open interviews, focus group discussions) to better understand the reasons of this low compliance. The phenomenon observed in Kasongo is definitely not a unique one, and unawareness of this problem is likely to be one of the reasons for the low success of pregnancy monitoring programs when they are assessed in terms of reduction of maternal morbidity and mortality.

Suggested Citation

  • Dujardin, B. & Clarysse, G. & Criel, B. & De Brouwere, V. & Wangata, N., 1995. "The strategy of risk approach in antenatal care: Evaluation of the referral compliance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 529-535, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:529-535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)E0095-A
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sushma Rajbanshi & Mohd Noor Norhayati & Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina, 2021. "A Qualitative Study to Explore the Barriers for Nonadherence to Referral to Hospital Births by Women with High-Risk Pregnancies in Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Murray, Susan F. & Pearson, Stephen C., 2006. "Maternity referral systems in developing countries: Current knowledge and future research needs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(9), pages 2205-2215, May.
    3. Buor, Daniel, 2003. "Mothers' education and childhood mortality in Ghana," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 297-309, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:529-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.