IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v40y1995i4p469-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heavy users of emergency services: Social construction of a policy problem

Author

Listed:
  • Malone, Ruth E.

Abstract

A relatively small subgroup of emergency department (ED) patients is responsible for a disproportionate amount of ED visits and costs. This subgroup, the heavy users of ED services, is identified as a medically and socially vulnerable population. Heavy users of ED services are identified as a 'problem' in the United States that opens a 'window' on the wider social issues critical to consensus on health care reform. The problem is nested within a complex of larger, interdependent problems including access to care, lack of primary/preventive services, absent or inadequate social services, and fragmented service delivery. This article uses the literature on heavy users of ED services to argue that social constructions of the problem and articulation of solutions by different key players in health care reform are based on divergent and often conflicting premises.

Suggested Citation

  • Malone, Ruth E., 1995. "Heavy users of emergency services: Social construction of a policy problem," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 469-477, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:469-477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)E0116-A
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corinne Blöchliger & Joseph Osterwalder & Christoph Hatz & Marcel Tanner & Thomas Junghanss, 1998. "Asylsuchende und Flüchtlinge in der Notfallstation," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 43(1), pages 39-48, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:4:p:469-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.