IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v39y1994i11p1537-1544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • van Agt, Heleen M. E.
  • Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
  • Krabbe, Paul F. M.
  • Bonsel, Gouke J.

Abstract

This study is a contribution by the Dutch participants to the research programme of the EuroQol Group. This collaborative group of researchers engaged in outcome measurement is working towards the development of a standardized, non-disease-specific instrument for describing and particularly valuing health-related quality of life. The present article analyses the test-retest reliability of the valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire in a population survey (n=208). The choice of the appropriate method for test-retest analysis is discussed and the results of several approaches with the EuroQol data are shown. Generalizability Theory is proposed as the most suitable method. This method is the most comprehensive, giving distinct information about the relative contributions of different sources of variance. The EuroQol valuations appear to have good test-retest reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • van Agt, Heleen M. E. & Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise & Krabbe, Paul F. M. & Bonsel, Gouke J., 1994. "Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1537-1544, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:11:p:1537-1544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(94)90005-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brooks, Richard AU -, 1996. "EuroQol: the current state of play," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 53-72, July.
    2. Paul F.M. Krabbe & Marie-Louise Essink-Bot & Gouke J. Bonsel, 1996. "On the Equivalence of Collectively and Individually Collected Responses," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 16(2), pages 120-132, June.
    3. Christopher J.L. Murray & Alan D. Lopez, 2000. "Progress and directions in refining the Global Burden of Disease approach: a response to Williams," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(1), pages 69-82, January.
    4. Björn Stessel & Maarten Hendrickx & Caroline Pelckmans & Gerrit De Wachter & Bart Appeltans & Geert Braeken & Jeroen Herbots & Elbert Joosten & Marc Van de Velde & Wolfgang F F A Buhre, 2021. "One-month recovery profile and prevalence and predictors of quality of recovery after painful day case surgery: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Zsombor Zrubka & Zsuzsanna Beretzky & Zoltán Hermann & Valentin Brodszky & László Gulácsi & Fanni Rencz & Petra Baji & Dominik Golicki & Valentina Prevolnik-Rupel & Márta Péntek, 2019. "A comparison of European, Polish, Slovenian and British EQ-5D-3L value sets using a Hungarian sample of 18 chronic diseases," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 119-132, June.
    6. Richard Holland & Richard D Smith & Ian Harvey & Louise Swift & Elizabeth Lenaghan, 2004. "Assessing quality of life in the elderly: a direct comparison of the EQ‐5D and AQoL," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(8), pages 793-805, August.
    7. D. Stratmann‐Schoene & T. Kuehn & R. Kreienberg & R. Leidl, 2006. "A preference‐based index for the SF‐12," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 553-564, June.
    8. Paul F. M. Krabbe & Elly A. Stolk & Nancy J. Devlin & Feng Xie & Elise H. Quik & A. Simon Pickard, 2017. "Head-to-head comparison of health-state values derived by a probabilistic choice model and scores on a visual analogue scale," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(8), pages 967-977, November.
    9. Alan Shiell & Penelope Hawe & Janelle Seymour, 2000. "Will our understanding of completeness ever be complete?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(8), pages 729-731, December.
    10. David Batalla-Martín & Angel Belzunegui-Eraso & Eva Miralles Garijo & Elena Martínez Martín & Rosanna Romaní Garcia & Jacobo San Miguel Heras & Marina Lopez-Ruiz & Maria Antonia Martorell-Poveda, 2020. "Insomnia in Schizophrenia Patients: Prevalence and Quality of Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Antonio Cuesta-Vargas & Jaime Martin-Martin & Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez & Jose Antonio Merchan-Baeza & David Perez-Cruzado, 2020. "Identification of Tools for the Functional and Subjective Assessment of Patients in an Aquatic Environment: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Wolfgang Greiner & Tom Weijnen & Martin Nieuwenhuizen & Siem Oppe & Xavier Badia & Jan Busschbach & Martin Buxton & Paul Dolan & Paul Kind & Paul Krabbe & Arto Ohinmaa & David Parkin & Montserat Roset, 2003. "A single European currency for EQ-5D health states," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 4(3), pages 222-231, September.
    13. Stavros Petrou & Christine Hockley, 2005. "An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(11), pages 1169-1189, November.
    14. Coast, Joanna, 2018. "A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 227-232.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:39:y:1994:i:11:p:1537-1544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.