IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v37y1993i5p591-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient satisfaction with communication in general surgery: Problems of measurement and improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Meredith, Philip

Abstract

The research reported here is taken from a pilot inquiry into patient experiences of general surgery provided in National Health Service hospitals. This study sought to identify how the cross section of patients facing general surgery experienced communication and information problems particular to their surgical 'settings', how such discontent is understood or rationalised by them, and consequently how it would be reported to relatives or researchers. Drawing on interviews with patients and surgical staff, the paper explores the range of communication difficulties facing certain types of patient which arise from the hospital setting and the routines and rituals of service providers. While it is concluded that communication should be explored with some reference to disease classification, this should not divert attention from the general context of care to the unique circumstances of patient or surgeon. It is questioned whether patients are always disposed to rationalise their difficulties in terms of 'dissatisfaction' in the way required by survey research. Drawing on interview-generated comments by patients and staff, the paper illustrates less obvious validity problems for patient satisfaction studies, and addresses briefly questionnaire design which may account for them.

Suggested Citation

  • Meredith, Philip, 1993. "Patient satisfaction with communication in general surgery: Problems of measurement and improvement," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 591-602, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:5:p:591-602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90098-O
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karolina Osowiecka & Radoslaw Sroda & Arian Saied & Marek Szwiec & Sarah Mangold & Dominika Osuch & Sergiusz Nawrocki & Monika Rucinska, 2020. "Patients’ Non-Medical and Organizational Needs during Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:5:p:591-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.