IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v37y1993i2p173-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal screening and vaccination against hepatitis B virus--The case of Belgium

Author

Listed:
  • Tormans, G.
  • Van Damme, P.
  • Carrin, G.
  • Clara, R.
  • Eylenbosch, W.

Abstract

The study examines the cost-effectiveness of screening pregnant women in Belgium for the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and of vaccinating the newborns if necessary. The alternative strategy considered is 'doing nothing'. The rate of carriership among a sample of pregnant women in Belgium amounts to 0.67%. If a pregnant woman is a carrier of the virus, there is an average probability of 30% that she will transmit the virus to her newborn. Later in life, this baby will be at risk from serious complications, such as chronic active hepatitis, cirrhosis and primary hepatocellular cancer. However, medical costs will be induced by screening and vaccination campaigns, lab-tests, vaccine costs, etc. On the other hand, resources will be saved by the prevention of severe complications of the disease. However, costs dominate savings, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the screening and vaccination strategy amounting to 583,581 BEF per life-year saved. To check the stability of the cost-effectiveness ratio, a sensitivity analysis has been performed on some crucial parameters: the ratio is found to be sensitive to the prevalence of HBV among pregnant women, to the costs for screening and vaccination and to the discount rate. Increasing the treatment costs for a HBV complication hardly changes the cost-effectiveness ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Tormans, G. & Van Damme, P. & Carrin, G. & Clara, R. & Eylenbosch, W., 1993. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal screening and vaccination against hepatitis B virus--The case of Belgium," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 173-181, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:2:p:173-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90453-B
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Geue & Olivia Wu & Yiqiao Xin & Robert Heggie & Sharon Hutchinson & Natasha K Martin & Elisabeth Fenwick & David Goldberg & Consortium and ECDC, 2015. "Cost-Effectiveness of HBV and HCV Screening Strategies – A Systematic Review of Existing Modelling Techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:2:p:173-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.