IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v368y2025ics0277953625001108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of separating drug sales from treatment on medical disputes

Author

Listed:
  • He, Qinghong
  • Liu, Gordon G.
  • Liu, Xiangbo
  • Tang, Daisheng

Abstract

For decades, the patient-physician conflict has been a persistent issue globally, particularly in China, where the situation has been deteriorating. To curb the inappropriate financial incentives of physicians, eliminate the practice of over-prescription, and improve the strained patient-physician relationship, the Chinese government has been implementing Separating Drug Sales from Treatment (SDST) in public hospitals since 2012. In this paper, we exploit the staggered difference-in-differences method and event study approach to examine the effects of SDST on medical disputes, based on administrative hospital-level annual data from 2011 to 2018 in G province. We find that SDST significantly decreases the number of total medical disputes by 10.0%, through reducing the over-prescription and medical malpractice, and improving hospital management practices and operational efficiency. This paper argues that removing the link between drug prescription and hospital revenue contributes to realigning physicians' financial incentives and thus building a healthy patient-physician relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Qinghong & Liu, Gordon G. & Liu, Xiangbo & Tang, Daisheng, 2025. "Effects of separating drug sales from treatment on medical disputes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:368:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001108
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:368:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.