IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v367y2025ics0277953625001200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social pension expansion and suicidal behaviour of older adults in Korea: A quasi-experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Chungah

Abstract

This study examines the effects of a significant reform to South Korea's social pension system—the introduction of the Basic Pension (BP) in July 2014—on suicidal behavior among older adults. We utilized data from the Korean Welfare Panel Study (2011–2021) to evaluate whether this reform has helped reduce suicidal behavior among BP beneficiaries compared to non-beneficiaries. Employing the Callaway and Sant’Anna Difference-in-Differences (CSDID) approach for a robust analysis, our findings report a significant reduction in suicidal behavior, particularly among women, with an overall reduction of 1.3%. The study highlights the policy effect of the BP in enhancing the economic and mental health stability of older adults, demonstrating the effectiveness of a generous old-age income security program in mitigating factors that contribute to high suicide mortality. These insights are crucial for policymakers aiming to strengthen the welfare state and improve public health outcomes in similar contexts globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Chungah, 2025. "Social pension expansion and suicidal behaviour of older adults in Korea: A quasi-experimental study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001200
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001200
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.