IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v367y2025ics0277953625000826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

WASH-friendly schools for whom? Integrating the perception of different school stakeholders in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Poague, Kasandra I.H.M.
  • Ramos, Andressa P.
  • de S. Lopes, Caio B.
  • Gonçalves, Gabriel V.L.
  • Damasceno, Marina B.R.
  • Blanford, Justine I.
  • Martinez, Javier A.
  • Anthonj, Carmen

Abstract

Ensuring that schools are water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) friendly requires WASH to be visibly implemented, inclusive and sustainable, engaging the entire school community, including direct and indirect stakeholders (school staff, students and their families). However, students, staff, and parents are often overlooked in the design of WASH solutions. This study aims to contrast different school stakeholders' perspectives on WASH and evaluate the extent to which the Human Right to Water and Sanitation (HRtWS) and its normative contents are being realized in schools within the basic education system, covering students aged 0 to 18. For that purpose, a mixed-method study was conducted involving seven schools located in a small municipality in the southeast region of Brazil. Data collection methods included on-site observations in schools, in-depth interviews with school staff and parents/legal guardians of students, and a one-day art-based research workshop with students around drinking water, sanitation, solid waste management and COVID-19. Several inconsistencies were identified when comparing primary findings with the schools' information previously provided by the Brazilian Government, including differences in the number of schools and levels of education offered, water sources, absence of bathrooms, and waste burning instead of solid waste collection. A clear violation of all the normative contents of the HRtWS was observed, which, in turn, were triggering and exposing students to incidents of violence such as bullying and verbal abuse. There was a misalignment among stakeholders about which interventions implemented amidst the COVID-19 pandemic are still in place. Moreover, discrepancies among school stakeholders' perceptions of WASH suggest insufficient communication among actors. As a result of this research, a list of recommendations formulated by stakeholders and the involvement and alignment of all stakeholders are the first steps in successfully co-creating solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Poague, Kasandra I.H.M. & Ramos, Andressa P. & de S. Lopes, Caio B. & Gonçalves, Gabriel V.L. & Damasceno, Marina B.R. & Blanford, Justine I. & Martinez, Javier A. & Anthonj, Carmen, 2025. "WASH-friendly schools for whom? Integrating the perception of different school stakeholders in Brazil," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000826
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000826
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.