IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v367y2025ics0277953625000796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will tomorrow be better? The moral experiments of three women with mental illness

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Zhuyun

Abstract

Based on 16 months of fieldwork in a Chinese psychiatric hospital from 2017 to 2019, this study applies Myers's concept of moral agency to explore the efforts of three women with mental illness in their pursuits of a better life, examining their actions and interactions with social workers throughout the process. It enriches our understanding of moral agency by demonstrating that its actualization requires not only freedom, intention, and access to their life plans, but also patients' reflections on the relationships between themselves and the others. The study provides an example to comprehend the recovery of moral agency within a family-centered context, where patients' aspirations for a better life may be constrained by cultural expectations. This study also suggests that hospital social workers should establish trusting relationships with patients to accurately assess their genuine understanding of a good life and navigate the institutional constraints with the patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Zhuyun, 2025. "Will tomorrow be better? The moral experiments of three women with mental illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000796
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000796
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.