IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v367y2025ics0277953625000413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative approaches to structural intersectionality research: Conceptual and methodologic considerations

Author

Listed:
  • Zubizarreta, Dougie
  • Beccia, Ariel L.

Abstract

There has been a recent influx in the development of novel measures of structural forms of discrimination, including structural racism, xenophobia, sexism, heterosexism, and cisgenderism. These systems of power and oppression are inherently interdependent and mutually constitutive, yet a paucity of research has investigated their joint impacts; this gap is likely reflective of the limited guidance that exists regarding how to effectively combine multiple measures of structural discrimination to examine their joint impacts on population health and health inequities. In this commentary, we seek to redress this by describing conceptual and methodologic considerations for population health researchers interested in conducting quantitative structural intersectionality research – an intersectionality-informed research approach focused on examining how systems of power and oppression intersect to shape population health and health inequities. Developing best practices for measuring and analyzing the joint impacts of structural forms of discrimination is crucial for effectively describing and quantifying their impacts on population health and health inequities, and for informing interventions, laws, and policies to advance health equity and social justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Zubizarreta, Dougie & Beccia, Ariel L., 2025. "Quantitative approaches to structural intersectionality research: Conceptual and methodologic considerations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000413
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.