IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v367y2025ics0277953625000383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Navigating the lived efficacies of Chagas treatment”

Author

Listed:
  • Ventura Garcia, Laia

Abstract

Drawing on an ethnographic study of Chagas treatment among migrant domestic workers in Catalonia, conducted between January 2014 and May 2016, and utilizing the concepts of “lay care” and “living labyrinths,” this paper explores how the efficacy of parasiticide treatments is experienced within relational and contextually situated frameworks. While pharmaceutical efficacy is often characterized by temporary and uncertain outcomes, the results indicate that lived efficacy is shaped by a complex interplay of embodied sociocultural, political, and historical processes, being continually negotiated and redefined within a broader context of global health values, biomedical technologies, migratory experiences and ethnicity, patient-doctor relationships, personal identities, daily demands, and care practices. The findings emphasize the reflexive management of the condition by those affected and highlight the role of pharmaceuticals as active agents that shape social and cultural dynamics, with significant impacts on social life and healthcare. By examining lived efficacy, the study suggests that limited access to healthcare services is not the sole process preventing treatment for Chagas, providing deeper insights into the logics behind actions related to Chagas pharmaceutical treatments. Incorporating “lay care” practices and perspectives into the therapeutic negotiation process not only acknowledges the complex “living labyrinths” navigated by social groups but also offers a foundation for reflecting on and reimagining alternative forms of care, recognizing their role in social and cultural reproduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ventura Garcia, Laia, 2025. "“Navigating the lived efficacies of Chagas treatment”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.