IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v367y2025ics027795362500036x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bidirectional work-family conflicts and work engagement: A longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Kobayashi, Yumiko
  • Haseda, Maho
  • Kondo, Naoki

Abstract

Increasing work engagement (WE) for worker health and turnover prevention has gained attention recently. Work-family conflict (WFC), which includes Work Interference with Family (WIF) and Family Interference with Work (FIW), is negatively associated with WE. The effects of WIF/FIW on WE are not fully understood. This study examined the longitudinal associations of WIF/FIW on WE by gender and household composition among employees. We conducted web-based surveys in 2020 and 2021, targeting full-time workers of a single private company (N = 3,437). The analysis included 425 respondents who completed two surveys. Multiple regression analyses stratified by gender and household composition were conducted, with WE at 1 year as the dependent variable and baseline WIF/FIW as independent variables. Higher WIF tend to be associated with lower WE (men in single-person households (SP): B = −0.07 [95% CI: -0.27, 0.14]; men in multi-person households (MP): B = −0.01 [95% CI: -0.12, 0.10]; SP women:B = −0.02 [95% CI: -0.31, 0.27]; MP women: B = −0.06 [95% CI: -0.25, 0.14]). The association between FIW and WE tended to be present only for women; higher FIW tend to be associated with lower WE (SP women: B = −0.03 [95% CI: -0.37, 0.30]; MP women: B = −0.06 [95% CI: -0.34, 0.21]). WIF, such as work-related stress, may reduce the energy available for personal activities among all workers. FIW, such as household tasks, may diminish the energy devoted to paid work, particularly among women living with family.

Suggested Citation

  • Kobayashi, Yumiko & Haseda, Maho & Kondo, Naoki, 2025. "Bidirectional work-family conflicts and work engagement: A longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500036x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500036X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:367:y:2025:i:c:s027795362500036x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.