IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v365y2025ics0277953624010190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The gendered impact of Covid-19 on health behaviours and mental health: Evidence from the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Arulsamy, Karen
  • McNamee, Paul
  • Mendolia, Silvia

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic affected the health behaviours of men and women differently, and to estimate whether the associations between health behaviours and mental health differed by gender. By employing nationally representative panel data (UKHLS) and a difference-in-differences strategy, we provide evidence that the pandemic adversely affected health behaviours among women more than men in the UK. Compared to men, women were 3.2 percentage points less likely to adopt a healthy lifestyle and reported 0.09 fewer healthy behaviours (corresponding to 7.0 per cent of a standard deviation) during the pandemic. These changes are primarily driven by smaller improvements rather than absolute declines in health behaviours for women compared to men. The changes in health behaviours among women appear to persist over time when lockdown policies were relaxed. Importantly, we find that the pandemic considerably weakened the protective effect of health behaviours on mental health for women but not for men. For women, adopting a healthy lifestyle was strongly correlated with mental health before the pandemic, but this relationship was no longer significant during the pandemic. This loss in significance corresponds to a 0.61-points decline in the GHQ-12 Likert score, equivalent to 10.5 per cent of a standard deviation. However, we observe a partial return of the protective effect of health behaviours on mental health once lockdown measures had eased.

Suggested Citation

  • Arulsamy, Karen & McNamee, Paul & Mendolia, Silvia, 2025. "The gendered impact of Covid-19 on health behaviours and mental health: Evidence from the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624010190
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624010190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624010190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.