IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v365y2025ics0277953624009791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The medical institution and transgender health: The role of healthcare barriers and negative healthcare experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Stacey, Lawrence
  • Wislar, Wes
  • Reczek, Rin

Abstract

Transgender health has risen as a topic of key interest. Yet little is known about factors that might stratify health among transgender people. In this paper, we suggest that the medical institution, which both prevents and provides access to transition-related care and thus sociolegal recognition for many transgender people, is a key institution for the health of transgender people. Drawing on 2015 US Transgender Survey data (USTS; N = 27,715), we examine whether transgender people who report barriers to healthcare and negative healthcare experiences have worse health than transgender people who do not. We contextualize the USTS sample against, and replicate our analyses when possible with, a probability-based sample of transgender people from the 2014–2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS; N = 2,386). We find that transgender people who have unmet medical needs and negative healthcare experiences have worse self-rated health than their transgender counterparts who do not. Findings also suggest that such barriers and experiences are more negatively associated with the health of non-binary/genderqueer people compared with transgender men and transgender women. Our study moves past prior work documenting a transgender health disadvantage by identifying specific characteristics associated with poor health of transgender people and by illuminating heterogeneity in such associations.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacey, Lawrence & Wislar, Wes & Reczek, Rin, 2025. "The medical institution and transgender health: The role of healthcare barriers and negative healthcare experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624009791
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624009791
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624009791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.