IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v35y1992i8p979-985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Costs of home care for advanced breast and cervical cancer in relation to cost-effectiveness of screening

Author

Listed:
  • Koopmanschap, Marc A.
  • van Ineveld, B. Martin
  • Miltenburg, Theo E. M.

Abstract

The costs of home care in the Netherlands are estimated for women with advanced breast and cervical cancer. We observe a growing role of intensive home care for the terminally ill patients. The average costs of home care are dfl 8500 per patient for breast cancer patients and dfl 7200 for cervical cancer patients. More than half of these costs are incurred in the last month before death. The level of home care in the preceding months is quite modest (dfl 120 per month for both diseases), not taking into account informal care. The costs of home care for patients with advanced cancer are only slightly related to the site of the primary tumor from which the metastases originate. Total average costs per patient during advanced disease, including hospital and nursing home care, amount to dfl 42,700 for breast cancer and dfl 29,000 for cervical cancer. This difference in costs is largely attributable to the longer duration of advanced disease for breast cancer, which substantially affects hospitalcosts. The high costs of care to patients with advanced cancer contribute to a favourable cost-effectiveness ration of those screening programmes which reduce mortality and consequently the costs of care to advanced cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Koopmanschap, Marc A. & van Ineveld, B. Martin & Miltenburg, Theo E. M., 1992. "Costs of home care for advanced breast and cervical cancer in relation to cost-effectiveness of screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 979-985, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:8:p:979-985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90237-K
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bech, Mickael & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte, 2000. "Cost implications of routine mammography screening of women 50-69 years in the County of Funen, Denmark," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 125-141, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:8:p:979-985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.