IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v35y1992i1p57-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychiatry as social ordering: Anorexia nervosa, a paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Gremillion, Helen

Abstract

From a psychiatric perspective, anorexia nervosa (hereafter referred to as 'anorexia') is an enigmatic illness. This paper attempts to explain why this is so, describing anorexia as a western cultural phenomenon whose psychiatric explanations and treatments actually participate in the sociocultural processes that inform this syndrome. Anorexia reveals a form of contemporary control over the female body, and psychiatry, as a western discipline, institutionalizes a mind-over-body (objective) ideology that is part of this project. Various psychiatric theories of anorectic etiology and their corresponding methods of treatment are analyzed in this light, and a general framework for understanding the discipline of psychiatry as a mode of social control is offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Gremillion, Helen, 1992. "Psychiatry as social ordering: Anorexia nervosa, a paradigm," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 57-71, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:1:p:57-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90119-B
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Musolino, Connie & Warin, Megan & Wade, Tracey & Gilchrist, Peter, 2015. "‘Healthy anorexia’: The complexity of care in disordered eating," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 18-25.
    2. Moulding, Nicole, 2006. "Disciplining the feminine: The reproduction of gender contradictions in the mental health care of women with eating disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 793-804, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:1:p:57-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.