IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v34y1992i10p1129-1134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of the PCQ: A questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography

Author

Listed:
  • Cockburn, Jill
  • De Luise, Trudy
  • Hurley, Susan
  • Clover, Kerrie

Abstract

We have developed a reliable and valid questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography. The questionnaire measures the effect of screening on an individual's functioning on emotional, social, and physical life domains. Content validity was ensured by extensive review of the relevant literature, discussion with professionals and interviews with attenders at a pilot Breast X-ray Screening Program in Melbourne, Australia. Discriminant validity was assessed by having expert judges sort items into dimensions which they appeared to be measuring. Acceptable levels of concordance (above 80%) with a priori classifications were found. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by comparison of subscale scores of 53 attenders at the Breast X-ray Program with an independent interview assessment of dysfunction on each of the emotional, social and physical dimensions. There was over 79% agreement between interview scores and questionnaire scores for each dimension. Construct validity was confirmed by showing that subscale scores varied in predicted ways. For women who were recalled for further investigation, scores on each subscale measuring negative consequences, were higher at the recall clinic that at screening clinic (emotional: t=-7.28; df=70; P

Suggested Citation

  • Cockburn, Jill & De Luise, Trudy & Hurley, Susan & Clover, Kerrie, 1992. "Development and validation of the PCQ: A questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1129-1134, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:10:p:1129-1134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90286-Y
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manning, Mark & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Yilmaz-Saab, Zeynep & Shultz, Julie & Purrington, Kristen, 2016. "Influences of race and breast density on related cognitive and emotion outcomes before mandated breast density notification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 171-179.
    2. Manning, Mark & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Yilmaz-Saab, Zeynep & Penner, Louis & Norman, Andria & Purrington, Kristen, 2017. "Explaining between-race differences in African-American and European-American women's responses to breast density notification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 149-158.
    3. Manning, Mark & Lucas, Todd & Purrington, Kristen & Thompson, Hayley & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Penner, Louis, 2023. "Moderators of the effects of perceived racism and discrimination on cancer-related health behaviors among two samples of African Americans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:34:y:1992:i:10:p:1129-1134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.