Author
Listed:
- Bristowe, Katherine
- Timmins, Liadh
- Pitman, Alexandra
- Braybrook, Debbie
- Marshall, Steve
- Johnson, Katherine
- King, Michael
- Roach, Anna
- Yi, Deokhee
- Almack, Kathryn
- Day, Elizabeth
- Clift, Paul
- Rose, Ruth
- Harding, Richard
Abstract
A recent national survey of bereaved partners found high levels of complicated grief and psychological distress, with evidence that loneliness and isolation may contribute to these outcomes. However, the mechanisms of action for this have not been explored. To advance grief theory this paper reports analysis of the survey free-text data to examine the relationship between social support and emotional responses to bereavement. Individuals bereaved of a civil partner or spouse 6–10 months previously were identified through death registration data. 569/1945 (29 %) completed surveys were received. Of those, 311 participants (55 %) provided responses to two free-text questions which asked about their ‘feelings since the death of their partner or spouse’, and ‘about the support around’ them. Data were analysed using corpus-assisted discourse analysis and the discourse dynamics approach for figurative language. Participants described diverse emotional responses to the bereavement (e.g. sadness, anger, denial, acceptance), and the value of formal and informal bereavement support. Although many of the experiences described are accounted for in existing grief theory, some participants described a liminal experience not recognised within these theories. They felt trapped, unable to engage with loss or restoration, and unable to move forward as their planned future no longer existed. They sought out ‘communitas’ (solidarity in experiences), but often found support from their social networks had diminished. Metaphors were used to describe this liminality, with partner grief expressed as a dark agentic force, a monster, an abyss, and as water. The findings of this study offer original insights into experiences and trajectories of bereavement, and our understandings of prolonged or complicated grief. A novel model ‘Between Loss and Restoration’ is presented to include these experiences. Recognition of the place for liminality within the spectrum of grief experiences could enhance grief literacy and improve formal and informal bereavement support provision.
Suggested Citation
Bristowe, Katherine & Timmins, Liadh & Pitman, Alexandra & Braybrook, Debbie & Marshall, Steve & Johnson, Katherine & King, Michael & Roach, Anna & Yi, Deokhee & Almack, Kathryn & Day, Elizabeth & Cli, 2024.
"Between loss and restoration: The role of liminality in advancing theories of grief and bereavement,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000601
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116616
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Zhao, Yingxi & Nzekwu, Stephanie & Boga, Mwanamvua & Mbuthia, Daniel & Nzinga, Jacinta & English, Mike & Molyneux, Sassy & McGivern, Gerry, 2024.
"Examining liminality in professional practice, relational identities, and career prospects in resource-constrained health systems: Findings from an empirical study of medical and nurse interns in Keny,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:344:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624000601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.