IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v31y1990i8p879-889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International comparative analysis: Main findings and conclusions

Author

Listed:
  • Wnuk-Lipinski, Edmund
  • Illsey, Raymond

Abstract

This paper compares the experiences of health and inequality reviewed in the Bulgarian, Hungarian, Polish and Soviet profiles. With health systems very similar in formal organization and stated aims, health status based on death rates has followed very similar tendencies in each country. Sharp post-war falls in infant death slowed down from the 60s onwards, but continued to fall. Life expectancy also increased but again from the late 60s began to fall, particularly for middle-aged men. Inequalities in health-care provision and access have been paralleled by inequalities in health outcome between areas and socio-economic groups. Comparative analysis, however, suggests that the dysfunctions of the health system have only been contributing factors to more fundamental causes stemming from socio-economic conditions, cultural and collective behaviour and the priorities of the political and economic system. Written before the transforming political events of late 1989, the reviews emphasise the need for change and a search for more effective and equitable systems and policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wnuk-Lipinski, Edmund & Illsey, Raymond, 1990. "International comparative analysis: Main findings and conclusions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 879-889, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:8:p:879-889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90024-M
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James W. Shaw & William C. Horrace & Ronald J. Vogel, 2002. "The Productivity of Pharmaceuticals in Improving Health: An Analysis of the OECD Health Data," HEW 0206001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 May 2003.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:8:p:879-889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.