IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v31y1990i4p507-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urbanisation and health: Methodological difficulties in undertaking epidemiological research in developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Yach, Derek
  • Mathews, Catherine
  • Buch, Eric

Abstract

Rapid urbanisation has historically resulted in complex societal changes which have had both beneficial and adverse effects on the health of communities. Recently, it has been recognised that the urban poor in developing countries are at greatest risk for several adverse health effects. The epidemiologist has a key role to play in planning to meet current and future health needs of urban communities. Epidemiological research needs to focus on understanding the relationship between the changes that occur with urbanisation and their impact on health, in order to identify those at greatest risk, to identify the important risk factors that are amenable to intervention, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving the health of urban communities. This paper addresses several methodological difficulties in conducting epidemiological research on urbanisation and health in developing countries, with particular reference to Southern Africa. These relate to the definition of urban areas and residence thereof, the comparability across areas of exposure and outcome information, the identification of intra-urban variability, selection bias in cross-sectional studies, associating outcomes with specific urban exposures in analytic studies, and determining appropriate interventions and means of evaluation. Ways of overcoming these difficulties are suggested. Epidemiologists need to address these issues in order to make a valuable contribution to the improvement of health in urban communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yach, Derek & Mathews, Catherine & Buch, Eric, 1990. "Urbanisation and health: Methodological difficulties in undertaking epidemiological research in developing countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 507-514, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:4:p:507-514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(90)90047-V
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dahly, Darren L. & Adair, Linda S., 2007. "Quantifying the urban environment: A scale measure of urbanicity outperforms the urban-rural dichotomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 1407-1419, April.
    2. Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. & Tessema, Workneh Kassa & van Trijp, Hans C.M., 2013. "Conducting field research in subsistence markets, with an application to market orientation in the context of Ethiopian pastoralists," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 83-97.
    3. Butala, Neel M. & VanRooyen, Michael J. & Patel, Ronak Bhailal, 2010. "Improved health outcomes in urban slums through infrastructure upgrading," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 935-940, September.
    4. Laura B. Nolan, 2015. "Slum Definitions in Urban India: Implications for the Measurement of Health Inequalities," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 59-84, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:31:y:1990:i:4:p:507-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.