IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i7p791-792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The concept of disease: Its evolution in medical students

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan, M. D.
  • McManus, I. C.

Abstract

First, third and fifth year medical students were asked to say to what extent they considered each of 38 conditions to be a disease, to be treatable, to be serious, to be the fault of the patient and to be external in cause. Fifth year students were significantly more inclusive in their use of the term disease, applying it to far more conditions, with third year students midway between the first and fifth year students. The use of the term disease did not relate to any great extent with its treatability, seriousness, blame or externality. The concept of disease, despite the difficulty of a consistent, formal philosophical definition, is heuristically useful, and is applied readily by medical students, evolving as students progress through medical school, in a way that cannot be explained in relation to other perceptions of the conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan, M. D. & McManus, I. C., 1989. "The concept of disease: Its evolution in medical students," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 791-792, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:7:p:791-792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90077-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:7:p:791-792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.