IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i3p463-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual and methodological problems in research on the quality of life in clinical medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Siegrist, Johannes
  • Junge, Astrid

Abstract

This introductory paper discusses three issues: theory, validity of measurement and benefits of assessment. It is argued that the conceptual entity 'quality of life' remains ill-defined, although researchers commonly agree on its multi-dimensional nature. The selectivity of dimensions under study is illustrated by referring to recent work on the quality of life in cancer and in cardiovascular disease. Despite conceptual weaknesses, promising developments are apparent in research methodology. The issue is discussed with special reference to the convergent and discriminant validity of some widely used research methods. Improvements in therapy and patient-physician relationships are considered among the major benefits of assessing the quality of life in clinical practice. In conclusion, this field of research, if based on appropriate theory, opens important opportunities for cross-fertilization between advanced medicine and the social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Siegrist, Johannes & Junge, Astrid, 1989. "Conceptual and methodological problems in research on the quality of life in clinical medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 463-468, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:3:p:463-468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90295-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Tejada & Oscar Rojas, 2005. "Application of an Irt Polytomous Model for Measuring Health Related Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 369-394, November.
    2. Anna Lewandowska & Grzegorz Rudzki & Tomasz Lewandowski & Michał Próchnicki & Sławomir Rudzki & Barbara Laskowska & Joanna Brudniak, 2020. "Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Marie-Christine Taillefer & Gilles Dupuis & Marie-Anne Roberge & Sylvie LeMay, 2003. "Health-Related Quality of Life Models: Systematic Review of the Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 293-323, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:3:p:463-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.