IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v29y1989i2p205-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mothers' benefit of a self-care booklet and a self-care educational session at child health centres

Author

Listed:
  • Rasmussen, Finn

Abstract

Mothers' benefit of a mass-distributed self-care booklet and a self-care educational session about young children's minor illnesses were investigated. The following questions were studied: (1) Do mothers of infants read and benefit from a self-care booklet? (2) Is the mothers' knowledge about self-care improved more if the booklet is supplemented by a self-care educational session? 265 (92%) of 288 randomly sampled Swedish mothers whose first child was 6-12 months of age were interviewed regarding their knowledge about self-care. Shortly thereafter a self-care booklet was mailed to all households in Uppsala county and 6.5 months later a new group of 572 mothers was randomly sampled. Among the 572 mothers, 332 (58%) were randomized to a self-care session organized at child health centres and 240 (42%) were not invited to a session. Of the 572 mothers, 530 (93%) were later interviewed about the booklet, the session and their knowledge about self-care. 69% participated among the mothers randomized to the session. Among these mothers, 99% recalled the booklet and 96% had read the child care section. Among the mothers not invited to the session, 68% recalled the booklet and 60% had read the child care section. The mothers who had read the child care section would follow the recommendations about when to seek (and not to seek) medical care significantly better than those who had not read it (P

Suggested Citation

  • Rasmussen, Finn, 1989. "Mothers' benefit of a self-care booklet and a self-care educational session at child health centres," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 205-212, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:2:p:205-212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90168-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:29:y:1989:i:2:p:205-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.