IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v28y1989i2p165-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variations in resource utilization--The role of medical practice and its economic impact

Author

Listed:
  • Eckerlund, Ingemar
  • Håkansson, Stefan

Abstract

Several studies have indicated that differences in medical practice are often an important factor behind variations in resource utilization. 'Practice', in medical contexts, is used as a comprehensive expression for what is regarded to be adequate care, considering science and proven experience, as well as present resources, demography, organization, and other given conditions. However, experience shows that routines and practice, even under similar conditions (resources, organization, etc.) often vary significantly among departments within the same medical discipline. In this more restricted sense, variations in practice might depend on different--more or less well-founded--opinions among physicians concerning what constitutes appropriate length of stay, level of care, and technology. With examples from some specialities (e.g. general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology), we demonstrate this 'model' and the economic impact of practice variations. Our conclusion is that there are opportunities for achieving greater benefit from existing resources, i.e. increasing efficiency, through reallocation and alternative utilization of resources, altered practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Eckerlund, Ingemar & Håkansson, Stefan, 1989. "Variations in resource utilization--The role of medical practice and its economic impact," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 165-173, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:2:p:165-173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(89)90144-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. Höjgård & U. Enemark & C. H. Lyttkens & A. Lindgren & T. Troëng & H. Weibull, 2002. "Discounting and clinical decision making: Physicians, patients, the general public, and the management of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 355-370, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:2:p:165-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.