IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v287y2021ics0277953621006997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Absorbing it all: A meta-ethnography of parents’ unfolding experiences of newborn screening

Author

Listed:
  • White, Ashley L.
  • Boardman, Felicity
  • McNiven, Abigail
  • Locock, Louise
  • Hinton, Lisa

Abstract

In a context of increasing international dialogue around the appropriate means and ends of newborn screening programmes, it is critical to explore the perspectives of those directly impacted by such screening. This meta-ethnography uses a systematic review process to identify qualitative studies that focus on parents' experiences of newborn screening published in English-language academic journals from 2000 to 2019 (n = 36). The included studies represent a range of moments, outcomes, and conditions that illuminate discrete elements of the newborn screening journey. We draw on these varied studies to construct a diagram of possible newborn screening pathways and through so-doing identify a critical window of time between the signalling of a positive newborn screen and the end of the screening process. During this critical window of time, families navigate complex emotional reactions, information, and decisions. From an in-depth analysis of this data, we develop the concept of “absorptive capacity” as a lens through which to understand parents' responses to new and emerging information. Alongside this, we identify how the “concertinaing of time” – the various ways that parents experience the expansion and compression of time throughout and beyond the screening pathway – affects their absorptive capacities. This study underscores the need to move away from viewing newborn screening as a discrete series of clinical events and instead understand it as a process that can have far-reaching implications across time, space, and family groups. Using this understanding of screening as a starting point, we make recommendations to facilitate communication and support for screened families, including the antenatal provision of information to parents and accommodations for the fluctuations in parents’ absorptive capacities across the screening trajectory.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Ashley L. & Boardman, Felicity & McNiven, Abigail & Locock, Louise & Hinton, Lisa, 2021. "Absorbing it all: A meta-ethnography of parents’ unfolding experiences of newborn screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:287:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621006997
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621006997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buchbinder, Mara & Timmermans, Stefan, 2011. "Newborn screening and maternal diagnosis: Rethinking family benefit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 1014-1018.
    2. Grob, Rachel, 2008. "Is my sick child healthy? Is my healthy child sick?: Changing parental experiences of cystic fibrosis in the age of expanded newborn screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1056-1064, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:287:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621006997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.