IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i9p955-970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computerized calculation of essential drug requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Soeters, Robert
  • Bannenberg, Wilbert

Abstract

The implementation of an effective essential drug programme, although accepted by most WHO member states is still meeting serious problems. Apart from politics the reasons for this slow implementation should be sought in organizational difficulties. A methodology for the calculation of national drug requirements has been developed for Gabon based on standard treatments and estimated number of cases per disease (also known as the demand-morbidity method). Allocation of these drugs to the Gabonese health institutions is calculated based on data from the existing health information system such as days of hospitalization and number of patient visits. A rudimentary form of the demand-morbidity method has been used manually in the past but was extremely cumbersome. Modern microcomputers and standard software have now improved speed and flexibility of the method and have therefore made its implementation feasible even in developing countries. The advantages of the method are the improved availability of essential drugs at all levels of the health system and a decrease of the required drug budget (for Gabon it was calculated that a saving of 45% could be obtained). The method makes possible interaction between health planners and peripheral staff unimaginable a few years ago.

Suggested Citation

  • Soeters, Robert & Bannenberg, Wilbert, 1988. "Computerized calculation of essential drug requirements," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 955-970, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:9:p:955-970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90287-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:9:p:955-970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.