IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i4p385-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: Frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon

Author

Listed:
  • Neuling, Sandra J.
  • Winefield, Helen R.

Abstract

In a longitudinal study of recovery after surgery for breast cancer, subjects reported the frequency of, and their satisfaction with, various supportive behaviours on the part of family members, close friends and medical professionals. The reliability of the Multi-Dimensional Support Scale (MDSS) devised for this purpose is described. Measures of psychological, social and physical adjustment approached normality by 3 months post-operation. Frequency of support from all sources decreased as time from surgery passed, whilst satisfaction with support varied with the type of support given and the source from which it was received. Quite different patterns emerged in support needs from professional and non-professional sources, with empathic support being required from all sources, whilst informational support was desired from surgeons, rather than from family and friends. Further, subjects were more discriminating in the amounts of support required from family and friends, such that it was more likely for these sources to give unwanted support than it was for professional sources, from whom many subjects reported inadequate support. Satisfaction with social support was matched with measures of adjustment, and it was found that those satisfied with support from family members were significantly less anxious and depressed in hospital than were those who were not satisfied with support from this source. However, at 1 month post-operation, anxiety and depression levels were significantly related to satisfaction with support from surgeons; and at 3 months post-operation, anxiety and depression measures were significantly related to satisfaction with support from both family members and surgeons. Further research is required to investigate the needs and problems of the lay person who, by virtue of social bonds with the patient is widely expected to fulfil a supportive function, yet who, because of lack of training or experience in such a situation may feel unequal to the task. Approaches which might amplify and/or prolong the support to patients from medical staff are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Neuling, Sandra J. & Winefield, Helen R., 1988. "Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: Frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 385-392, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:4:p:385-392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90273-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Virginia & Robin Cohen, S. & Edgar, Linda & Laizner, Andrea M. & Gagnon, Anita J., 2006. "Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 3133-3145, June.
    2. Johnson, Blair T. & Acabchuk, Rebecca L., 2018. "What are the keys to a longer, happier life? Answers from five decades of health psychology research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 218-226.
    3. Eleanor Law & Janelle V Levesque & Sylvie Lambert & Afaf Girgis, 2018. "The “sphere of care”: A qualitative study of colorectal cancer patient and caregiver experiences of support within the cancer treatment setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:4:p:385-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.