Author
Listed:
- van Doornen, L. J. P.
- de Geus, E. J. C.
- Orlebeke, J. F.
Abstract
Aerobically fit persons need less sympathetic activation to perform the same absolute workload than less fit persons. This led to the idea that aerobic fitness might reduce the physiological activation during psychological stress as well. Several experiments showed inconsistent results with regard to this supposed effect of fitness. The comparability of the results is hampered by the differences in operationalization of aerobic fitness and by the confusion of the terms aerobic fitness, training and habitual physical exercise. The expectancy of an effect of fitness on the physiological stress response is based on the assumption that this response resembles the response to exercise. The tenability of this assumption was examined for cardiac, vascular and hormonal responses respectively. It was concluded that the two types of responses only superficially have similarity. So a simple analogy between the stress and the exercise response does not allow a reliable prediction concerning the effect of fitness on the stress response. There are however other reasons to expect an effect. Especially the effect of fitness on adrenoceptor sensitivity suggests that the most important effect of fitness might be found in the vascular part of the stress response. It is argued that the measurement of complete response patterns, instead of isolated parameters, is a prerequisite for progress in this field. Future studies should address the question what the relative contribution of psychological and physiological factors is to the effect of fitness on the physiological stress response.
Suggested Citation
van Doornen, L. J. P. & de Geus, E. J. C. & Orlebeke, J. F., 1988.
"Aerobic fitness and the physiological stress response: A critical evaluation,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 303-307, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:3:p:303-307
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:3:p:303-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.