IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i9p1063-1068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of medical students' residency and specialty choices

Author

Listed:
  • Taggart, Mary P.
  • Wartman, Steven A.
  • Wessen, Albert F.

Abstract

The contemporary geographic maldistribution of physicians and shortages in some specialty areas is a persistent problem facing United States federal and state wide health planners. This paper attempts to illustrate some of the formal and informal processes of the selection of specialties and recidency programs based on a survey of senior students of 37 selected American medical schools at the time of the National Residency Matching Program in 1982. Results of a factor analysis on influences on specialty choice produced two major clusters of medical students; those predominantly influenced in specialty choice by the faculty and other senior physicians (sponsorship), and those predominantly influenced by the social dimension of the physicians' role (social responsibility). These medical specialty choice orientations were also systematically related to either choice of specialty vs primary care medicine, to a life-style or status related choice of residency program, and to students' perceptions regarding a program's evaluation of a candidate. The results of the survey suggested that students who chose primary care were more apt to be influenced by sources outside of the medical school. These findings raise questions regarding the efficacy of medical school curriculum in motivating career choices in primary care. This is particularly important in view of the stated need to increase the proportion of medical school graduates choosing primary care careers.

Suggested Citation

  • Taggart, Mary P. & Wartman, Steven A. & Wessen, Albert F., 1987. "An analysis of medical students' residency and specialty choices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(9), pages 1063-1068, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:9:p:1063-1068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90012-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeffery Sobal & Bruce R. DeForge & Kevin S. Ferentz & Herbert L. Muncie Jr & Carmine M. Valente & David M. Levine, 1990. "Physician Responses to Multiple Questionnaire Mailings," Evaluation Review, , vol. 14(6), pages 711-722, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:9:p:1063-1068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.