IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i8p961-966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health promotion talk in family practice encounters

Author

Listed:
  • Freeman, Sarah H.

Abstract

The model of family medicine advocates a view of the patient as a psychosocially grounded person, and stresses the value of a preventive approach in maintaining health. Given such principles, it is expected that in the expression of this model--in actual family practice encounters--physicians will regularly introduce topics about health promoting behaviors in their interactions with patients. Examination of a sample of typical and unrehearsed encounters between family physicians and patients, however, reveals a striking absence of such topics. Where they do occur, there is conversational evidence that both parties find the topics troublesome, and employ conversational strategies which tend to distance these topics from the rest of the interview. The conversational features of these distancing strategies, as well as their possible sources and implications, are discussed. Physician participants in the research express no reluctance to introduce topics related to health promotion behavior, and in fact report that they do so regularly: the latter is contradicted by empirical conversational data. Difficulties that physicians evidence in managing these topics--in the absence of any conscious dispreference--suggest that shared interpretive frames operating for the remainder of the medical encounter do not work well for these topics. Physicians desiring to communicate effectively in this area may need to rethink health promotion talk as a special conversational task, which differs in key ways from more conventional topics introduced in medical encounters.

Suggested Citation

  • Freeman, Sarah H., 1987. "Health promotion talk in family practice encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(8), pages 961-966, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:8:p:961-966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90267-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wheat, H. & Barnes, R.K. & Aveyard, P. & Stevenson, F. & Begh, R., 2022. "Brief opportunistic interventions by general practitioners to promote smoking cessation: A conversation analytic study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:8:p:961-966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.