IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v256y2020ics0277953620302574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucracies and power: Examining the Medical Council of India and the development of emergency medicine in India

Author

Listed:
  • Sriram, Veena
  • Baru, Rama
  • Hyder, Adnan A.
  • Bennett, Sara

Abstract

In many countries, professional councils are mandated to oversee the training and conduct of health professionals, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists and allied health workers. The proper functioning of these councils is critical to overall health system performance. Yet, professional councils are sometimes criticized, particularly in the context of low- and middle-income countries, for their misuse of power and overtly bureaucratic nature. The objective of this paper is to understand how professional councils use their bureaucratic power to shape health policy and systems, drawing upon the recent development of emergency medicine in the context of the former Medical Council of India. We undertook a qualitative case study, conducting 87 interviews, observing 6 meetings and conferences, and reviewing approximately 96 documents, and used the Framework method to analyze our data. The passive exercise of bureaucratic power by the Council resulted in three challenges – 1) Opaque policy processes for recognizing new medical specialties; 2) Insular, non-transparent training policy formulation; 3) Unaccountable enforcement for regulating new courses. The Council did not have the requisite technical expertise to manage certain policy processes, and further, did not adequately utilize external expertise. In this time period, the Council applied its bureaucratic power in a manner that negatively impacted emergency medicine training programs and the development of emergency medicine, with implications for availability and quality of emergency care in India. The successor to the Council, the National Medical Commission, should consider new approaches to exercising bureaucratic power in order to meet its objectives of strengthening medical education in India and ensuring access to high-quality services. Future studies should also explore the utilization of bureaucratic power in the health sectors of low- and middle-income countries in order to provider a deeper understanding of institutional barriers to improvements in health.

Suggested Citation

  • Sriram, Veena & Baru, Rama & Hyder, Adnan A. & Bennett, Sara, 2020. "Bureaucracies and power: Examining the Medical Council of India and the development of emergency medicine in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:256:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620302574
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620302574
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ensor, Tim & Weinzierl, Sabine, 2007. "Regulating health care in low- and middle-income countries: Broadening the policy response in resource constrained environments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 355-366, July.
    2. Macrae, Joanna & Zwi, Anthony B. & Gilson, Lucy, 1996. "A triple burden for health sector reform: 'Post'-conflict rehabilitation in Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 1095-1108, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hunter, Benjamin M. & Murray, Susan F. & Marathe, Shweta & Chakravarthi, Indira, 2022. "Decentred regulation: The case of private healthcare in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuey, Dean A. & Qosaj, Fatime Arenliu & Schouten, Erik J. & Zwi, Anthony B., 2003. "Planning for health sector reform in post-conflict situations: Kosovo 1999-2000," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 299-310, March.
    2. Leonard, David K. & Bloom, Gerald & Hanson, Kara & O’Farrell, Juan & Spicer, Neil, 2013. "Institutional Solutions to the Asymmetric Information Problem in Health and Development Services for the Poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 71-87.
    3. Wafula, Francis & Molyneux, Catherine & Mackintosh, Maureen & Goodman, Catherine, 2013. "Protecting the public or setting the bar too high? Understanding the causes and consequences of regulatory actions of front-line regulators and specialized drug shop operators in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 220-227.
    4. Andrews, Gavin J. & Kearns, Robin A., 2005. "Everyday health histories and the making of place: the case of an English coastal town," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2697-2713, June.
    5. Judith Kabajulizi, 2013. "Macroeconomic Implications Of Health Sector Reforms In Uganda: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," EcoMod2013 5158, EcoMod.
    6. Rosemary Morgan & Tim Ensor, 2016. "The regulation of private hospitals in Asia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 49-64, January.
    7. Gonzalez Block, Miguel Angel, 1997. "Comparative research and analysis methods for shared learning from health system reforms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 187-209, December.
    8. Miller, Rosalind & Hutchinson, Eleanor & Goodman, Catherine, 2018. "‘A smile is most important.’ Why chains are not currently the answer to quality concerns in the Indian retail pharmacy sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 9-16.
    9. Jitta, Jessica & Whyte, Susan Reynolds & Nshakira, Nathan, 2003. "The availability of drugs: what does it mean in Ugandan primary care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 167-179, August.
    10. Hunter, Benjamin M. & Murray, Susan F. & Marathe, Shweta & Chakravarthi, Indira, 2022. "Decentred regulation: The case of private healthcare in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Ranson, Kent & Law, Tyler J. & Bennett, Sara, 2010. "Establishing health systems financing research priorities in developing countries using a participatory methodology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 1933-1942, June.
    12. Jeppsson, Anders & Birungi, Harriet & Ostergren, Per-Olof & Hagstrom, Bo, 2005. "The global-local dilemma of a Ministry of Health: Experiences from Uganda," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 311-320, June.
    13. Kruk, Margaret E. & Freedman, Lynn P. & Anglin, Grace A. & Waldman, Ronald J., 2010. "Rebuilding health systems to improve health and promote statebuilding in post-conflict countries: A theoretical framework and research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 89-97, January.
    14. Ngatho Mugo & Anthony B. Zwi & Jessica R. Botfield & Caitlyn Steiner, 2015. "Maternal and Child Health in South Sudan," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    15. Reem Abuiyada & Ra’ed Abdulkarim, 2016. "Non-Governmental Health Organizations in Palestine from Israeli Occupation to Palestinian Authority," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-29, December.
    16. Seye Abimbola & Kemi Ogunsina & Augustina N. Charles-Okoli & Joel Negin & Alexandra L. Martiniuk & Stephen Jan, 2016. "Information, regulation and coordination: realist analysis of the efforts of community health committees to limit informal health care providers in Nigeria," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:256:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620302574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.