IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v243y2019ics0277953619305854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beijing's diagnosis-related group payment reform pilot: Impact on quality of acute myocardial infarction care

Author

Listed:
  • Jian, Weiyan
  • Lu, Ming
  • Liu, Guofeng
  • Chan, Kit Yee
  • Poon, Adrienne N.

Abstract

In 2012, China's first diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment system was piloted in Beijing. This study explored whether this payment pilot improved quality and reduced costs of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care in hospitals implementing DRG payment as compared to control hospitals. A difference-in-difference study design was used with regression and considered several quality indicators including aspirin at arrival, aspirin at discharge, β-blocker at arrival, β-blocker at discharge, statin at discharge, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. DRG payment mechanisms without specific mechanisms to promote care quality did not improve quality of AMI care. Future studies should study the impact of cost control mechanisms together with quality improvement efforts to assess how quality of care may be improved within the Chinese healthcare system. These lessons would be helpful to share with lower-middle-income countries undergoing rapid development that are transitioning to a significantly higher burden of non-communicable diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian, Weiyan & Lu, Ming & Liu, Guofeng & Chan, Kit Yee & Poon, Adrienne N., 2019. "Beijing's diagnosis-related group payment reform pilot: Impact on quality of acute myocardial infarction care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:243:y:2019:i:c:s0277953619305854
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619305854
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamada, Hironori & Sekimoto, Miho & Imanaka, Yuichi, 2012. "Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-like grouping system (DPC/PDPS) on resource usage and healthcare quality in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 194-201.
    2. Robert C. Rock, 1985. "Assuring Quality of Care Under DRG-Based Prospective Payment," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 5(1), pages 31-34, February.
    3. Davis, Carolyne K. & Rhodes, Deborah J., 1988. "The impact of DRGs on the cost and quality of health care in the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 117-131, April.
    4. Or., Zeynep, 2014. "Implementation of DRG Payment in France: Issues and recent developments," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 146-150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lingli Zhang & Lihua Sun, 2022. "Impacts of case‐based payments reform on healthcare providers' behaviour on cataract surgery in a tertiary hospital in China: An eight‐year retrospective study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 504-512, January.
    2. Qian, Mengcen & Zhang, Xinyu & Chen, Yajing & Xu, Su & Ying, Xiaohua, 2021. "The pilot of a new patient classification-based payment system in China: The impact on costs, length of stay and quality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    3. Damrongplasit, Kannika & Atalay, Kadir, 2021. "Payment mechanism and hospital admission: New evidence from Thailand healthcare reform," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    4. Jamie O’Halloran & Anne Sophie Oxholm & Line Bjørnskov Pedersen & Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen, 2024. "Going the extra mile? General practitioners' upcoding of fees for home visits," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 197-203, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng, Zhaolin & Hui, Wen & Cai, Yuanyi & Liu, Jiazhou & Wu, Huazhang, 2020. "The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 359-367.
    2. Hironori Uematsu & Susumu Kunisawa & Kazuto Yamashita & Yuichi Imanaka, 2015. "The Impact of Patient Profiles and Procedures on Hospitalization Costs through Length of Stay in Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients Based on a Japanese Administrative Database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Milstein, Ricarda & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2024. "The end of an era? Activity-based funding based on diagnosis-related groups: A review of payment reforms in the inpatient sector in 10 high-income countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Parida Wubulihasimu & Werner Brouwer & Pieter van Baal, 2016. "The Impact of Hospital Payment Schemes on Healthcare and Mortality: Evidence from Hospital Payment Reforms in OECD Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(8), pages 1005-1019, August.
    5. Buczak-Stec, Elżbieta & Goryński, Paweł & Nitsch-Osuch, Aneta & Kanecki, Krzysztof & Tyszko, Piotr, 2017. "The impact of introducing a new hospital financing system (DRGs) in Poland on hospitalisations for atherosclerosis: An interrupted time series analysis (2004–2012)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(11), pages 1186-1193.
    6. Li‐Lin Liang, 2015. "Do Diagnosis‐Related Group‐Based Payments Incentivise Hospitals to Adjust Output Mix?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 454-469, April.
    7. Chanturidze, Tata & Esau, Mike & Hölzer, Simon & Richardson, Erica, 2016. "Introducing Diagnosis-Related Groups in Kazakhstan: Evolution, achievements, and challenges," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 987-991.
    8. Hamada, Hironori & Sekimoto, Miho & Imanaka, Yuichi, 2012. "Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-like grouping system (DPC/PDPS) on resource usage and healthcare quality in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 194-201.
    9. Gautam Gowrisankaran & Keith A. Joiner & Jianjing Lin, 2016. "How do Hospitals Respond to Payment Incentives?," NBER Working Papers 22873, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Valentelyte, Gintare & Keegan, Conor & Sorensen, Jan, 2023. "Hospital response to Activity-Based Funding and price incentives: Evidence from Ireland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Guccio, Calogero & Lisi, Domenico & Pignataro, Giacomo, 2014. "Readmission and Hospital Quality under Prospective Payment System," MPRA Paper 56490, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Wiley, Miriam M. & Fetter, Robert B., 1990. "Measuring Activity and Costs in Irish Hospitals: A Study of Hospital Case Mix," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number GRS147.
    13. Simon Reif & Lucas Hafner & Michael Seebauer, 2020. "Physician Behavior under Prospective Payment Schemes—Evidence from Artefactual Field and Lab Experiments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-37, July.
    14. Kato, Naoko & Kondo, Masahide & Okubo, Ichiro & Hasegawa, Toshihiko, 2014. "Length of hospital stay in Japan 1971–2008: Hospital ownership and cost-containment policies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 180-188.
    15. Kroneman, Madelon & Nagy, Julia, 2001. "Introducing DRG-based financing in Hungary: a study into the relationship between supply of hospital beds and use of these beds under changing institutional circumstances," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 19-36, January.
    16. Zeynep Or & Coralie Gandré & George Wharton, 2022. "Soutenabilité et résilience du système de santé français," Working Papers DT88, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Jun 2022.
    17. Kohei Hasegawa & Hirokazu Toubou & Teruomi Tsukahara & Tetsuo Nomiyama, 2021. "Short-Term Associations of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) with All-Cause Hospital Admissions and Total Charges in 12 Japanese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Xiaolei Xiong & Zhiguo Zhang & Jing Ren & Jie Zhang & Xiaoyun Pan & Liang Zhang & Shiwei Gong & Si Jin, 2018. "Impact of universal medical insurance system on the accessibility of medical service supply and affordability of patients in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Polyzos, Nikolaos & Karanikas, Haralampos & Thireos, Eleftherios & Kastanioti, Catherine & Kontodimopoulos, Nick, 2013. "Reforming reimbursement of public hospitals in Greece during the economic crisis: Implementation of a DRG system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 14-22.
    20. Moreno-Serra, Rodrigo & Wagstaff, Adam, 2010. "System-wide impacts of hospital payment reforms: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 585-602, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:243:y:2019:i:c:s0277953619305854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.