IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i6p595-604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variations in the diagnosis of psychosocial disorders: A general practice observation study

Author

Listed:
  • Verhaak, Peter F. M.

Abstract

The factors that influence the interpretation and treatment of psychosocial complaints by general practitioners are discussed. The assessment of complaints differs considerably from one GP to another, in the sense that one will attach significance to psychological and sociological factors in many more cases than another. We investigate the effect of physician characteristics and their styles of communication on their bias over psychosocial assessments and treatment, and the way these effects are interrelated. The interpretation and eventually the treatment of complaints by 30 GPs (complaints presented at approx. 50 consultations per GP) were studied. Data of treatment and communication were collected from observation of the videotaped consultations, data of interpretation were collected on questionnaires for each consultation; doctor characteristics were inventarized by questionnaire. The following results can be reported. When a doctor communicates with a patient in an open manner, more complaints are interpreted as 'non-somatic' and treated as such. The same is the case among doctor's with a 'general medical' approach, rather than a 'clinical' one, when we look at interpretation. The effect on treatment is less marked. Practice characteristics and a GP's subjective feeling of competence have greater consequences for treatment than for judgement. There is not much interaction between the discerned effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Verhaak, Peter F. M., 1986. "Variations in the diagnosis of psychosocial disorders: A general practice observation study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 595-604, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:6:p:595-604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90153-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:6:p:595-604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.