IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v230y2019icp158-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family planning in Pakistan: A site of resistance

Author

Listed:
  • Ataullahjan, Anushka
  • Mumtaz, Zubia
  • Vallianatos, Helen

Abstract

As the population of Pakistan has increased beyond 200 million, it is evident that the country's family planning program has been unable to sufficiently expand contraceptive use. To understand the obstacles, researchers have tended to focus on service delivery failures, ‘cultural’ barriers and varying political support. However, a small body of literature documents citizen's suspicions of an ulterior motive underlying Pakistan's family planning program. Often dismissed as unfounded conspiracies, a gap in our knowledge is the role these beliefs might be playing in the failure of the program. Using a critical ethnographic approach, we conduced 242 observations of daily life, 109 informal and 197 in-depth interviews with 41 women and 35 men living in a village in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Data were collected between September 2013 and April 2015 and analysed using latent content analysis. Our respondents viewed Western support for family planning as confirmation of their suspicions of the program's hidden agenda. Western military intervention in the region complicated their beliefs about the potential altruistic nature of foreign support for the family planning program. Awareness of rampant corruption among Pakistani government officials had fractured their trust in the state while contributing to the notion that the government was complicit with foreign interference. These considerations coupled with the fact that the priorities of Pakistani Family Planning program did not align with the reality of their lives contributed to the skepticism of family planning. For our respondents, resisting family planning and its ideology was a means to resist the perceived violence inflicted by the West and the complicity of the Pakistani government. These findings signal how geopolitics influence the use of family planning services. By demonstrating the importance of embedding perceptions of family planning programs in their local and global contexts, these findings suggest potential areas for future research in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Ataullahjan, Anushka & Mumtaz, Zubia & Vallianatos, Helen, 2019. "Family planning in Pakistan: A site of resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 158-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:230:y:2019:i:c:p:158-165
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619302217
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaler, Amy, 2009. "Health interventions and the persistence of rumour: The circulation of sterility stories in African public health campaigns," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1711-1719, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adnan Muhammad Shah & KangYoon Lee & Javaria Nisa Mir, 2021. "Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonja Merten & Adriane Martin Hilber & Christina Biaggi & Florence Secula & Xavier Bosch-Capblanch & Pem Namgyal & Joachim Hombach, 2015. "Gender Determinants of Vaccination Status in Children: Evidence from a Meta-Ethnographic Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Jaffré, Yannick & Suh, Siri, 2016. "Where the lay and the technical meet: Using an anthropology of interfaces to explain persistent reproductive health disparities in West Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 175-183.
    3. Kaler, Amy & Angotti, Nicole & Ramaiya, Astha, 2016. "“They are looking just the same”: Antiretroviral treatment as social danger in rural Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 71-78.
    4. Hye‐Jin Paek & Thomas Hove, 2019. "Mediating and Moderating Roles of Trust in Government in Effective Risk Rumor Management: A Test Case of Radiation‐Contaminated Seafood in South Korea," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2653-2667, December.
    5. Liwei Zhang & Kelin Chen & He Jiang & Ji Zhao, 2020. "How the Health Rumor Misleads People’s Perception in a Public Health Emergency: Lessons from a Purchase Craze during the COVID-19 Outbreak in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:230:y:2019:i:c:p:158-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.