IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v22y1986i2p185-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mental health care and the opposition movement in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Haafkens, J.
  • Nijhof, G.
  • Van der Poel, E.

Abstract

In The Netherlands, there is a more or less recognized movement in the field of mental health care which is referred to as the psychiatric opposition movement or the patients movement. The nucleus of the dutch movement consists of patients and ex-patients. As far as mental health professionals are participating in the movement, they do so as more or less passive supporters of a movement dominated by patients and ex-patients. This article is dealing with two questions. The first question is how and to what degree the opposition movement in The Netherlands has succeeded in breaking through or at least questioning the closed nature of Dutch mental health care system. The second question will be whether the dilemma between resistance and dependence in the position of patients and ex-patients is visible in the activities of the opposition movement, and whether this dilemma acted as an obstacle to their efforts to influence the mental health care debate in The Netherlands. An effort is being made to answer this question by describing the position of the opposition movement with respect to the Insanity Law and with respect to the organization of mental health care. In conclusion, three stages were found to be crucial in the development of Dutch opposition movement. 1. (1) In the 1970s, the opposition movement appeared to operate within the borders of a closed system in which the medical profession had a high degree of autonomy. 2. (2) By the end of the 1970s, a shift could be detected in the opposition movement from the old desire to work within the system to a new desire to alter the system as such. 3. (3) Since 1980, it has been possible to detect a third development. The existence of the mental health care system as a social institution has been critically appraised to propagate the de-institutionalization of the existing system of clinical psychiatry.

Suggested Citation

  • Haafkens, J. & Nijhof, G. & Van der Poel, E., 1986. "Mental health care and the opposition movement in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 185-192, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:2:p:185-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90067-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Freitas, Cláudia & Martin, Graham, 2015. "Inclusive public participation in health: Policy, practice and theoretical contributions to promote the involvement of marginalised groups in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 31-39.
    2. Pilgrim, David & Rogers, Anne E., 2005. "Psychiatrists as social engineers: A study of an anti-stigma campaign," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 2546-2556, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:2:p:185-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.