IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v22y1986i10p1035-1046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limits to medical dominance: The case of chiropractic

Author

Listed:
  • Coburn, David
  • Biggs, C.Lesley

Abstract

This paper describes and analyzes the social history of chiropractic in Canada to partially test a thesis regarding changes in the dominance of the medical profession. We earlier sketched the rise of medicine to dominance by World War I, its consolidation until after World War II, and signs of the start of a decline in dominance signalled by the 1962 doctors' strike in Saskatchewan. One test of the historical sequence described, and particularly the recent signs of decline in medical power, is to examine one of orthodox medicine's major competitors, chiropractic. To what degree has medicine been successful in its opposition to chiropractic? The development of chiropractic in Canada shows its early survival and latterly, in the 1960s and 1970s its increasing popular use and official recognition. Particularly important in its recent success was the establishment of a college in Canada in 1945 and partial inclusion of chiropractic under government health insurance in the 1970s. While chiropractic has gained in acceptance and recognition it has sacrificed many of its earlier claims to be an alternative healing art and to some degree chiropractic has become 'medicalized'. But medicine has also been forced to make concessions. Despite total medical opposition, chiropractic survives. The recent successes of chiropractic tend to confirm our earlier thesis of the beginnings of the decline of medical dominance and to show that medicine, while dominant, was never hegemenous. However, chiropractic did not produce medicine's current difficulties. Rather medicine is being challenged directly by state power and pressures to rationalize health care and indirectly is affected by the class struggle. Chiropractic itself owes much of its own early success to support by the working class and working class organizations such as unions. In this sense both medicine and chiropractic can only be adequately viewed both in relationship to one another and as part of the changing Canadian social structure as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Coburn, David & Biggs, C.Lesley, 1986. "Limits to medical dominance: The case of chiropractic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(10), pages 1035-1046, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:10:p:1035-1046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90204-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kelner, Merrijoy & Wellman, Beverly & Welsh, Sandy & Boon, Heather, 2006. "How far can complementary and alternative medicine go? The case of chiropractic and homeopathy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(10), pages 2617-2627, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:10:p:1035-1046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.